Search Keywords
Financial Times Wall Street Journal Economist
News Period From   To
News: 60885    Funds: $437    Pays: $524

Go Back to
News List
This News on
Daily Paywall
  Rated 28 | Views 239
Rate it | Share it 

Markets Regulation
Banks agree to new derivatives rule book
From the Financial Times of Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:50:15 GMT

The world’s biggest banks have agreed to tear up the rule book on derivatives to make it easier to resolve a future failing institution like Lehman Brothers.

People familiar with the matter said 18 bank “dealers”, ranging from Credit Suisse to Goldman Sachs, have agreed to give up the right to pull the plug on derivatives contracts with a crisis-stricken institution.

Several months of complex talks involved regulators and asset managers but were led by dealers under the umbrella of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

The process is being portrayed by the banks as a positive example of the industry collaborating to solve a regulatory problem without it being imposed by officials.

Isda is due to announce the agreement to change its “protocols”, which govern the $700tn market, in the next few days. They will take effect from January 1 2015.

According to a report from the US Government Accountability Office, 80 per cent of Lehman’s derivatives counterparties closed out their deals with the bank within five weeks of its bankruptcy filing.

That, in theory, helped the companies mitigate their counterparty risk with the failed bank but it also meant that Lehman’s estate had to spend years in court trying to claw back collateral from its partners.

“One of the problems with Lehman was when there was a failure of one subsidiary clients of derivatives trades took funding away and took business away, adding to market instability,” said one bank negotiator.

This also made it harder to find buyers for the rump of Lehman. The current thinking among regulators is that the core of a failing institution should be preserved. Although shareholders would be likely to be wiped out, the operating company would be recapitalised or sold to mitigate the shock to the broader financial system.

“You have the financial sector absorb the losses but you have the company stay in business,” said another industry negotiator. “Assuming it gets signed up, it’s a very important step in ending ‘too big to fail’.”

The concept of “too big to fail” has become hugely controversial since the financial crisis when AIG was bailed out by the US government because of fear of the consequences of its failure.

Regulators have been struggling to come up with a viable system to avoid a repeat of the expensive bailout of AIG or the damaging failure of Lehman. The Dodd-Frank financial reforms in the US and parallel reforms in Europe instituted new procedures to “resolve” a failing institution but many believed these were unworkable without changes to derivatives contracts.

The vast majority of derivatives contracts will be covered by the agreement to change the Isda protocols, according to banks, but there are several elements yet to settle.

One of the most important is that large institutional investors such as BlackRock would not be covered by the changes, particularly if they are cross-border counterparties. Regulators are working to compel the investors to accept the new protocols, which they have so far resisted because they want to preserve the ability to stop doing business with a failing bank.

Another element that is not finalised is how the system would work in the event of a US company going through bankruptcy in the courts rather than the new resolution regime. Participants in the Isda talks said the industry had come to agreement and “prewired” the way this would work but it required regulation to make it effective.

The overhaul has drawn criticism from some who think that regulators may have made a mistake in asking the industry to update the derivatives documents voluntarily. Some market participants had suggested that regulators introduce incentives, such as preferential capital margin treatment, to speed negotiations.

Additional reporting by Gina Chon in Washington

This article is provided by, which is published and distributed by Paolo Cirio Ltd., registered in England, number 8188080. Registered Office: Suite 36, 88-90 Hatton Garden, City of London, EC1 N8PG, United Kingdom. Paolo Cirio Ltd. alone is responsible and liable for information and services provided through Daily Paywall’s newspaper and website.

Earn Money
Offer Money
Buy Advertising
Buy Artwork Article

Similar Articles
Financial News that Matter for free!